User talk:BlueNight

The Trinity
I'm quite looking forward to seeing you write on the Trinity. I think I'll add some content here (not on the Trinity, since I'm not completely familiar with it) tonight, or tomorrow. Probably tonight. Schmidt 01:04, 3 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I would have interpreted as trinity : three :: unity : one, so that rather than the "three in one" idea, it would be "The Three".
 * {| style="background: white; text-align: center;"


 * - style="background: black; color: white;"
 * one || unity || many acting together || equivalence, any value divided by an equivalent value
 * - style="background: black; color: white;"
 * two || duality || duo, two acting together || contrast of a set of two
 * - style="background: black; color: white;"
 * three || trinity || trio, three acting together || no parallel that I can think of
 * - style="background: black; color: white;"
 * many || plurality multiplicity infinity || many assuming power many faces of the same numberless instances || a large number, or any number divided by zero
 * }
 * I don't know where this is going, but anyways, above all, I don't agree that "Trinity" comes from "Tri" + "Unity" any more than "Infinity" comes from "Infinite" + "Unity". Schmidt 22:52, 12 June 2006 (UTC)